№1(61)
March 2018
ISSN
1990-4126

Russian

«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 1(61) March 2018

Theory of architecture


Vlasov Victor G.

DSc (Art Studies), Professor, Chair of History of West European Art,
Saint-Petersburg State University,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: natlukina@list.ru

ARCHITECTURE AS A FINE ART. THEORY OF OPEN FORM, PRINCIPLE OF PARTICIPATION AND SYNOPTIC METHOD IN ART STUDIES


History of architecture demonstrates artistic transformation of structure and transition of many a traditional theme and motif into the area of metaphorical meanings. Architecture represents an organizing force of all arts. It defines the place, structure and functions of related products of art, graphics and sculpture and, therefore, architecture is not only a fine art but it is also an art that depicts and transforms. The subject-matter of depiction in architecture are not objects of the surrounding reality but the most general concepts and subjective experiences of form and space, physical and spiritual forces, energy, aspirations, and flights of thought in space and time. Architect’s thinking is also connected with the realization of the so-called open form and principle of participation – partnership between the creator and the customer, spectator, user. These features explain the phenomenon which in the 20th–12st century, unlike the traditional synthesis of arts, displays interpenetration of technical-aesthetic, artistic and exposition-play activity methods. Hence follows the particular importance of architectonic thinking for all plastic arts and current relevance of architecture-centric knowledge and synoptic approach combining many methods and techniques of Art Studies.

Key words: architecture, architectonic thinking, fine arts, metaphor, metonymy, order, open form, participation, synoptic method, art form, art tropes



References

1. Husserl, Е. (1960) Meditazioni Cartesiane. Milano: Bompiani, p. 91.

2. Vaneyan, S. S. (2004) The Vacant Throne. The Art Criticism of Hans Sedlmayr. Мoscow: Progress-Traditsiya, p. 9 (in Russian).

3. Wölfflin, H. (1946) Prolegomena zu einer Psychologie der Architektur. Basel, p. 6.

4. Berdyaev, N. А. (1989) The Philosophy of Freedom. The Meaning of Creativity. Moscow: Pravda, p. 446 (in Russian)

5. Frankl, V. (1990) Man’s Search for Meaning. Moscow: Progress, p. 94. (in Russian)

6. Bandmann, G. (2004) Iconology of Architecture. Translated from German by S.S.Vaneyan. Iskusstvoznaniye, No. 1, p. 438 (in Russian)

7. Vipper, B. R. (1970). Articles about Art. Moscow: Iskusstvo, pp. 355—357 (in Russian).

8. Vlasov, V. G. (2017) Order and Ordination in Architecture: from Marcus Vitruvius Pollio to Michel Foucault [Online] Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education, No. 57. Available from: http://archvuz.ru/2017_1/1 (in Russian)

9. Vaneyan, S. S. (2010) Architecture and Iconography: «The Body of Symbol» in the Mirror of the Classical Methodology. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, p. 13 (in Russian)

10. Sedlmayr, H. (1999) Art and Truth. Moscow: Iskusstvoznaniye (in Russian)

11. Gidion, Z. (1984) Space, time, architecture. Moscow: Stroyizdat, p. 252—264 (in Russian).

12. Paperniy, V. Z. (2011) Fuck Context? Ekaterinburg: TATLIN. 13. Sitte, C. (1993) City Planning According to Artistic Principles. Moscow: Stroyizdat, p. 66—68 (in Russian).

14. Burckhardt, J.C. (1996) The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. Мoscow: Intrada, p. 345 (in Russian).

15. Vlasov, V. G. (2016) Architecture — Frozen Music or Moving Melody? (Saving will come from gravitation rather than crescendo). [Online]. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education, No. 53. Available from: http://archvuz.ru/2016_1/1 (in Russian).

16. Gogol, N. V. (1952–1953) Collected Works in 6 Vol. Vol. 6, Moscow: Goslitizdat, p.47 (in Russian).

17. Eco, U. (2004) The Open Work: Form and Uncertainty in Contemporary Poetry. Saint-Petersburg: Akademichesky Projekt (in Russian).

18. Maistrovskaya, М. Т. (2011) Evgeny Rozenblum and Exhibition Art. Problemy Dizaina. Мoscow: NII RAH, No. 6, p. 88 (in Russian).

19. Orlova, E. А. (2011) Artistic Design as a World Outlook. Problemy Dizaina. Мoscow: NII RAH, No. 6, p. 125 (in Russian).

20. Jencks, Ch. (1985) The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. Moscow: Stroyizdat (in Russian).

21. Rykov, А. V. (2007) Postmodernism as «Radical Conservatism». Saint-Petersburg: Aleteya (in Russian).

22. Venturi, R. (1972) Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. Moscow: Iskusstvo, p. 547 (in Russian).

23. Belogolovsky, V. Disorder in the Architecture of Robert Venturi [Online]. Available from: https://archi.ru/press/russia/3129/besporyadok-v-arhitekture-roberta-ven... (in Russian).

24. Bakushkina, Е. S. (2016) The Architecture of Museum Buildings in the Second Half of the 20th — Early 21st Century. Summary of PhD dissertation. Saint-Petersburg, p. 7–8 (in Russian).

25. Dorfles, G. (1984) Architettura ambigue. Dal Neobarocco al Postmoderno. Bari: Dedalo.

26. Tokarev, А. S. (2007) The Use of Cinema Art in Architectural Design. Summary of PhD dissertation. Ekaterinburg (in Russian).

27. Rusev, К. V. (2014) Cinematography of the 20th—21st Centuries as a Means for Avant-Garde Modelling of Architectural Utopias. Novy Universitet, No. 11 (33), p. 28–36 (in Russian).

28. Volchok, Yu. P. (2015) Knowledge of Antiquity and Architectural Studies in the 1960s: the Arche of Contemporary Architecture. In: Current Issues in the Theory and History of Art, Issue 5. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg State University, p. 788 (in Russian).


Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-70832 of 30.08.2017 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017