March 2018


«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 3(59) September 2017


 Gabrielyan Tigran O.

PhD. (Art Studies), Tutor,
V.I.Vernadsky Crimean Federal University,
Simferopol, e-mail: Tigrangabr@tagart-studio.com 


The article deals with the work of design theorists on the problem of a scientific component of design. By correlating domestic and foreign studies, a system of scientific research is being developed that reveals the theoretical and empirical essence of knowledge about design. Verification and falsifiability are put forward as the criteria of truth (being scientific) of new knowledge. Using a research project of a semiotic interactive graphic design environment as an example, the author shows stages of verification by studying the components of the research system, the problem field and the areas of their interaction. The criterion of falsifiability is applied to the fundamental components of the semiotic interactive graphic design environment: aesthetics, methodology, and technology, and to problem field.

Key words: design, methodology, scientific research, verification, falsifiability, semiotic interactive graphic design environment


1. Allahverdov, V.M., Karmin, A.S., Shilkov, Yu.M. (2008) Principle of Verifiability. Part III. Strategies of Independent Verification. Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii. Moscow, vol. 3, i. 2, pp. 175-185. (in Russian)

2. Bystrova, T.Yu. (2007) The Project as a Basic Category of Design Philosophy. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education. Ekaterinburg, vol. 17, pp. 15-24. (in Russian)

3. Gabrielyan, T.O. (2016). A Conceptual Model for Visual Identification of Brand in Graphic Design. Summary of PhD Dissertation. S.G. Stroganov Moscow Art and Industry Academy. (in Russian)

4. Gabrielyan, T.O. (2017) Semiotic Interactive Graphics as an Alternative Vector for the Development of Graphic Design in the Context of Digital Art. Proceedings of the All-Russian Research to Practice Conference. Moscow, MGHPA, pp. 115-119. (in Russian)

5. Galkin, D.V. (2009) Understanding Interactivity: Cybernetics in the Mirror of Aesthetics. In: Mozhaeva, G.V. (ed.). Humanitarian Informatics. Tomsk, pp. 47-59. (in Russian)

6. Zhdanova, N.S. (2016) Comparative Analysis of the Definitions of "Design" in Different Domestic Concepts of Design. In: Current Issues in Modern Science, Technology and Education. Magnitogorsk, MGTU, vol. 2, i. 1, pp. 34-36. (in Russian)

7. Sidorenko, V.F., Kuz'michev, L.A., Dizhur, A.L. et al. (1987) Methodology of Artistic Design. Design Program: Methodological Materials. Moscow, VNIITE. (in Russian)

8. Stepin V.S. (2003) Specifics of Scientific Cognition. In: Science: Opportunities and Boundaries]. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 7-20. (in Russian)

9. Theoretical and Methodological Studies in Design. Moscow: Shk. Kul't . Polit. Publ., 2004. (in Russian)

10. Yao, M.K., Borodina, S.D., Emanova, Yu.G. (2011) Visualization as a Tendency of the Forms of Culture, Art, Communication. Vestnik TGGPU. Kazan, vol. 4 (26), pp. 296-302. (in Russian)

11. Love, T. (2000). Philosophy of Design: a Metatheoretical Structure for Design Theory. Design Studies, Elsevier, vol. 21, pp. 293–313.

12. Sargent, P. (1994). Design Science or Nonscience. Design Studies, Elsevier, vol. 15 (4), pp. 389-402.

13. Vermaas, P.E. (2014). Design Theories, Models and Their Testing: on the Scientific Status of Design Research. In: Chakrabarti, A., Blessing L.T.M. (Eds.). An anthology of theories and models of design philosophy, approaches and empirical explorations. London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 47-66.

14. Visser, W. (2009). Design: One, but in different forms. Design Studies, Elsevier, vol. 30 (3), pp. 187-223.

Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-70832 of 30.08.2017 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017