March 2018


«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 58 June 2017

Theory of architecture

Vlasov Victor G.

DSc (Art Studies), Professor, Chair of History of West European Art,
Saint-Petersburg State University,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: natlukina@list.ru


The author considers the evolution of ideas of place and functions of architectonic arts (architecture, applied decorative art and design) in the context of a progressive system of classes, families, types and varieties of design and art creativity. A tendency is identified towards historical transformation of bifunctionality – overcoming of the duality in the contents applied artworks. In the history of culture, household things are acquiring an increasingly broader significance. Transition to the symbolic function imparts to utilitarian things new iconic contents. The idea is that things get dematerialized, and they are understood and handled not as material bodies but as objects of historical, cultural and social relations. A morphology of the 20th–21st century art is constructed accordingly.

Key words: architecture, applied decorative art, design, bifunctionality, art morphology, representational creativity


1. Cocteau, J. (1985) Portraits-Souvenir. Мoscow: Izvestia, p. 62. (in Russian)

2. Van de Velde, H. (1965) The Animation of Materials as a Principle of Beauty. Dekorativnoye iskusstvo SSSR,No. 2, p. 34–37. (in Russian)

3. Ioffe, I. I. (1933) A Synthetic History of Art. Introduction to History of Artistic Thinking. Leningrad: OGIZ-IZOGIZ, p. 549. (in Russian)

4. Vlasov, V. G. (2016) Architecture — Frozen Music or Moving Melody? (Saving will come from gravitation rather than crescendo). [Online]. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education, No. 53. Available from: http://archvuz.ru/2016_1/1 (in Russian)

5. Vlasov, V.G. (2017) Theory of Form Generation in Fine Arts. SPb.: St.Petersburg State University Publishing. (in Russian)

6. Kudin, P.A. (1997) Proportions in a Picture as Musical Accords. Foundations of the Theory and Methdology of Proportionality in Composition. SPb.: Rubin, p. 14. (in Russian)

7. Krauss, R. (1976) Video: The Aesthetics of Narcissism. October, Vol. 1, pp. 50—64.

8. Kagan, М. S. (1996) Philosophy of Culture. SPb.: Petropolis, p. 259. (in Russian)

9. Saltykov, A. B. (1968) The Сlosest Art. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye. (in Russian)

10. Gerchuk, Yu.Ya. (1969) A Storm in a Glass without Bottom. Dekorativnoye Iskusstvo SSSR, No. 2, p. 45–47. (in Russian)

11. Smirnov, B.A. (1969) A Crisis? Of What? Dekorativnoye Iskusstvo SSSR, No.12, p.27–29. Dekorativnoye Iskusstvo SSSR

12. Glazychev, V.L. (1969) Beauty and Use of Decorative Art. Dekorativnoye Iskusstvo SSSR, No.8, p. 5. (in Russian)

13. Kopylkov, M. A, Izotova, M. D. (2011) One Composition. SPb.: Novaya Niva, p. 7. (in Russian)

14. Kantor, K. M. (1967) Beauty and Use: Sociological Issues in Material Art Culture. Moscow: Iskusstvo, p. 18. (in Russian)

15. Rozenblyum, E.A. (1966) Four Designs. Dekorativnoye Iskusstvo SSSR, No. 1 (98), p. 7–9. (in Russian)

16. Orlova, E. A. (2011) Art Design as a World Outlook. In: Issues in Design. Moscow: NII RAKh, No. 6, p. 125. (in Russian)

17. Disappearing Things. (1967) In: Industrial Design USA. Exhibition catalogue. New-York – Moscow, p. 56. (in Russian)

18. Epstein, M.N. (1985) Realogy – a Science of Things. Dekorativnoye Iskusstvo SSSR, No. 6, p. 21–22. (in Russian)

19. Vlasov V. G. (2016) Tectonics and Dissymmetry of Architectural Composition. [Online]. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education, No. 56. Available from: http://archvuz.ru/2016_4/1 (in Russian)

20. Dutsev, M.V. (2013) The Concept of "Fields" of Art Integration in Latest Architecture. Bulletin MGSU. Moscow: MGSU, No. 2, p. 22–28. (in Russian)

21. Shmit, F.I. (1924) Painting, Sculpture, Architecture. Pechat’ i Revolutsiya, No. 3, p. 114. (in Russian) * 

Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-70832 of 30.08.2017 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017