December 2016


«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 56 December 2016

Theory of architecture

Vlasov Victor G.

DSc (Art Studies), Professor, Chair of History of West European Art,
Saint-Petersburg State University,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: natlukina@list.ru


The article is devoted to historically diverse relationships in tectonics, the properties of which are symmetry and harmony of proportions, asymmetries and dissymetries of architectural composition. Unlike asymmetry (disturbance or total absence of symmetry), dissymmetry implies similarity and simultaneous distinction between the elements of a whole. Based on the works of classics of architectural theory, the author finds the solution to the problem in the specificity of the spatial-temporal continuum of architectonic composition – the motor and plastic fine-art character of architectural space. These features define design techniques and compositional variety of buildings. Disturbance of historically evolving relationships in tectonics, symmetry and dissymetry leads to degeneration of architecture into installation art.

Key words: motor space, dissymetry, symmetry, visual dynamics, installation, composition, direction of form


1. Vlasov, V.G. (2015) Chaos Theory, A-Rhythmology and Method of Cluster Analysis in Modern-Day Art Studies [Online]. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education, No. 51 (in Russian).

2. Brunov, N.I. (1973) Monuments of the Acropolis of Athens: Parthenon and Erechtheion. Moscow: Iskusstvo, p.65 (in Russian).

3. Choisy, A. (1935) The History of Architecture. In 2 vol. Мoscow: All-Union Academy of Architecture, vol. 1, p. 301–302 (in Russian)

4. Hildebrand, A. (1991). The Problem of Form in Fine Arts and Collection of Articles. Moscow: MPI, pp. 195–196 (in Russian)

5. Vlasov, V. G. (2015) Implicit Aesthetics, Relief Principle and the Theory of Formbuilding in Architectonic-Visual Arts. International Research Journal XXXIX. Issue 5 (36), Part 3, p. 102–105.

6. Bötticher, K. (1844–1852) Die Tektonik der Hellenen. Bd. I: Einleitung und Dorika. Potsdam.

7. Vitruvius. (2005) The Ten Books on Architecture. Book 1, ch. II, 1-9. Moscow: KomKinga, p. 11-14 (in Russian).

8. Vipper, B.R. (1972) The Art of Ancient Greece. Moscow: Nauka, p. 219 (in Russian).

9. Sitte, C. (1993) City Planning According to Artistic Principles (1889). Moscow: Stroyizdat (in Russian).

10. Hildebrand, A. (1908) Towards an understanding of artistic relationships between architectural situations. In: Hildebrand, A. (1991) The Problem of Form in Fine Art and Collected Articles. Moscow: MPI, p. 148 (in Russian).

11. Arkin, D.E. (1990) Images of Architecture and Images of Sculpture. Мoscow: Iskusstvo, p. 36 (in Russian).

12. Benois, A.N. (1902) Picturesque Petersubrg. Mir iskusstva, No.1, p. 3–12 (in Russian).

13. Kashaverskaya, Yu.I. (2001) In an unfamiliar Leningrad: On the unfinished book of the architect and painter Ya.O. Rubanchik. In: Krayevedcheskiye zapiski, issue 8. Saint-Petersburg: Akropol, p. 284–287 (in Russian).

14. Grigorenko, G.F. Two Roman Temples [Online]. ARTMATLAB forum. Available at: http://www.artmatlab.ru/site/forum.php?sm=4# (in Russian)

15. Semper, G. (1970) Practical Aesthetics. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian).

16. Uspensky, B.A. (1995) Semiotics of Art. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury, p. 297–328 (in Russian).

17. Vernadsky, V.I. (1965). The Chemical Structure of the Earth’s Biosphere and Its Surroundings. Moscow: Nauka, p. 166–172 (in Russian).

18. Venturi, R. (1966) Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York, p. 14.

19. Jencks, Ch. (1977) The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. New York.

20. Deleuze, G, le Pli. (1988) Leibniz et le Baroque. Paris: Minuit.

21. Fedorov-Davydov, А.А. (1929) The Russian Art of Industrial Capitalism. Moscow: GAHN.

22. Revzin, G.I. (2002) Essays on Philosophy of Architectural Form. Moscow: OGI, p.126 (in Russian).

Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-50147 of 06.06.2012 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017