March 2018


«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 52 December 2015

Theory of architecture

Vlasov Victor G.

DSc (Art Studies), Professor, Chair of History of West European Art,
Saint-Petersburg State University,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: natlukina@list.ru


The article considers the category of the void in traditional and contemporary aesthetics. Based on the latest philosophical concepts, the author expounds the basic aspects involved in the reconsideration of the category of the void in architectural structures– the semantics, the compositional functions and the aesthetic perceptions. The use of the motifs of the void is illustrated by examples from latest Japanese, Near-Eastern and Western European architecture. The concept of "zero form» or "antiform" in modern design is considered. An analysis of form building in recent projects shows their extra-style nature beyond the habitual relationship between the product and its environment. Hence comes a new understanding of ecological design as the forecasting of consumer properties by creating a polyvariant and outwardly even disordered environment. It is such a space, free from imposed orderliness, that is most likely to become the subject-matter of future design activity.

Key words: architecture, design, metabolism, fractal architecture, ecological design


1. State Tretyakov Gallery. Moscow Biennale of Contemporary Art [Online] Available from: http://www.tretyakovgallery.ru/ru/calendar/exhibitions/exhibitions2617 (in Russian)

2. Malevich, К.S. (1916) From Cubism and Futurism to Suprematism... The new realism in painting. Мoscow., 1916. (in Russian)

3. Titus Lucretius Carus. On the Nature of Things. (1, 146–158). (in Russian)

4. Sharipov, М. R. The Philosophical Foundations of the Void (Void Set) [Online] Available from: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0016/001b/00160180.htm (in Russian)

5. Dakhin, А. V. The Philosphical Meaning of the Poincaré-Perelman Theorem and the Issue of the Spatial Structure of the Universe: Reconsidering the Concept of «Matter and Memory» [Online] Available from: http://www.globalistika.ru/congress2008/Doklady/04810.htm (in Russian)

6. Bergson, H. (1999) Creative Evolution. Matter and Memory. Minsk: Harvest, 1999. (in Russian)

7. Kagan, М. S. (2001) The Metamophoses of Being and Non-Being. Voprosy filosofii. No. 6. P. 52. (in Russian)

8. Konovalova, N. A. (2006) The «Triad»: void – space – shadow in contemporary architecture of Japan. Japan. Yearbook. No. 35. P. 106–110. (in Russian)

9. Kenkō, Yoshida. (1998) Essays in Idleness. Saint-Petersburg: Severo-Zapad. (in Russian)

10. Kurokawa, K. (1991) Intercultural Architecture. The Philosophy of Symbiosis. London: John Wiley & Sons. P. 310–312.

11. Kornev, S. (1997) The Collision of Voids: Could Postmodernism be Russian and Classical? New Literary Review. No. 28. P. 244–259. (in Russian)

12. Deleuze, G. (1998) Difference and Repetition. Saint-Petersburg: Petropolis. P. 13–18. (in Russian)

13. Serbina, N.V. (2011) A Thing and Space between Things in an Artwork Painting. Summary of PhD dissertation (Art Studies). Ekaterinburg. P. 10. (in Russian)

14. ARCHIDOM. 2004. No. 8 (49). P. 40–43. (in Russian)

15. Fedorov-Davydov, А. А. (1929) The Russian Art of Industrial Capitalism. Мoscow: GAHN. (in Russian)

16. Danilova, I. Е. (1968) The Issue of Genres in European Painting: Man and Thing. Portrait and Still-Life. Мoscow: Russian State University of Humanities. P. 56. (in Russian)

Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-70832 of 30.08.2017 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017