June 2017


«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 51 September 2015

Theory of architecture

Veslopolova Galina N.

PhD. (Architecture), Associate Professor,
Chair of Fundamentals of Architectural Design,
Penza State University of Architecture and Construction,
Penza, Russia, e-mail: galina.veslopolova@yandex.ru


Establishing order and being the guarantor of the reliability of structures created by him, the architect relied until recently on the anthropomorphic principle of similarity, which is most vividly embodied in the classical order. This fundamental centuries-long imperative of the profession is been called in question today.

The extra-tectonic extra-order origins of life, another format of human life and of the individual are obvious signs of today. The possibilities of changing one’s sex and appearance and new forms of reproductive activity change the personal and physiological profile. What we observe is the incompatibility of the anthropomorphic metamorphoses with the traditional norms of the world order, the tectonic foundations of which are being undermined. Proportioning as the architectural and universal law of organisation is also losing its positions. The divine proportion which the world has been struggling to find since its creation is becoming the domain of history.

Key words: similarity principle, architectural order, Greek antique order tradition, canonical order, tectonic structure


1. Azizyan, I.A., Dobritsina, I.A., Lebedev, G.S. (2002) Theory of Composition as the Poetics of Architecture. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. (in Russian)

2. Alberti, L.-B. (1935) Ten Books on Architecture. Moscow: All-Union Academy of Architecture. (in Russian)

3. Architectural Theory. From the Renaissance to the Present: 89 Essays on 117 Treatises. Koln: Taschen, 2011.

4. Banham, R. (1980) A Personal View of Modern Architecture. Age of the Masters. Moscow: Stroyizdat. (in Russian)

5. André Bonnard. (1992) Greek Civilization. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)

6. Burov, А.К. (1968) On Architecture. Moscow: Gosstroyizdat. (in Russian)

7. Veslopolova, G.N. (1985) Architectural Activity as a Basis for Developing the Model of an Architect. Summary of PhD Dissertation. Мoscow. (in Russian)

8. Veslopolova, G.N. (2012) Eclecticism as a Vector of Architecture. Bulletin of Tomsk University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Tomsk: TGASU. Issue 3. P. 65–73. (in Russian)

9. Kant, I. (1994) Critique of Pure Reason. Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)

10. Lebedeva, G.S. (2008) From Vitruvius to Alberti: from Architecture to Architecture Theory. In: Essays on the History of Theory of Architecture of the Early Modern Period and Contemporaneity. Saint-Petersburg: Kolo. P. 35–60 (in Russian)

11. Loktev, V.I. (2004) Baroque from Michelangelo to Guarini. Moscow: Arkhitektura-S. (in Russian)

12. Losev, A.F. (1978) The Aesthetics of the Renaissance. Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)

13. Malakhov, S.A. (1980) Patterns in the Emergence of a Creative Concept in the Creativity of an Architect. PhD dissertation (Architecture). Moscow (in Russian)

14. Mikhailovsky, I.B. (2004) Architectural Forms of the Antiquity. Moscow: Arkhitektura-S. (in Russian)

15. Musatov, A.A. (2004) The Architecture of Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Moscow: Arkhitektura-S. (in Russian)

16. Nechayev, N.N. (1987) Design Modelling as a Creative Activity (Psychological foundations of higher architectural education). Summary of Doctor of Science dissertation (Psychology). Moscow. (in Russian)

17. Rzhekhina, O.I. (1980) Andrey Konstantinovich Burov. Moscow: Iskusstvso. (in Russian)

18. Smolina, N.I. (1980) The Tradition of Symmetry in Architecture. Moscow: Stroyizdat. (in Russian)

Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-50147 of 06.06.2012 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017