June 2017


«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 47 September 2014


Tretyakova Maria S.

Doctoral student,
University of Art and Design,
Kyoto, Japan, e-mail: mashanadya@gmail.com   


This article is devoted to the interpretation of Tradition within the framework of a contemporary paradigm by means of ‘patterns’. First the author describes the contemporary picture of the world and the related new paradigm in architecture and design called ‘metamodernism’. Then she defines the term ‘pattern’ in its specific meaning similar to ornament in Theory of Art. The author formulates two approaches using pattern for interpretation of tradition: 1) creation of patterns using copies of traditional ornaments and 2) ‘restructuring’ of traditional ornaments using ideas of new mathematics. The author concludes that interpretation of tradition in contemporary architecture and design is either formal (mostly in the first approach) or very sophisticated because of double or triple meanings produced by ideas of contemporary science (the second approach). But the latter gives us exciting new possibilities for interpretation of tradition.

Key words: parametrical design, computing designing, metamodernism, pattern, ornament


  1. Jencks, Ch. (2003) The New Paradigm in Architecture [Online] Project International. No. 5. Available from: http://www.a3d.ru/architecture/stat/155
  2. Fesenko, D. (2013) Postmodernism Transit – Architectural Reflexes [Online] Arkhitekturny Vestnik. No. 4 (133). Available from: http://archvestnik.ru/node/7365
  3. Burry, J., Burry, M. (2010) The New Mathematics of Architecture. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
  4. Jencks, Ch., Kropf, K. (1997) Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. London: Academy Editions.
  5. Garcia, M. (2009) Prologue for a History, Theory and Future of Patterns of Architecture and Spatial Design. In: The Patterns of Architecture: Architectural Design. London: Wiley. Vol. 79. N. 6. P.6–17.
  6. Hensel, M., Menges, A., Weinstock, M. (2010) Emergent Technologies and Design: Towards a Biological Paradigm for Architecture. Oxon: Routledge.
  7. Liotta, S.-J., Belfiore M. (2012) Patterns and Layering: Japanese Spatial Culture, Nature and Architecture. Berlin: Gestalten.
  8. Lu, P., Steinhardt, P. (2007) Decagonal and Quasi-Crystalline Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture [Online] Science. Vol. 315. Available from: www.physics.princeton.edu
  9. Saunders, A. Baroque Parameters (2009) Theoretical Meltdown: Architectural Design. London: Wiley. Vol. 79. No. 1. P.132–135.
  10. Schumacher, P. (2009) Parametric Patterns. The Patterns of Architecture: Architectural Design. London: Wiley. 2009. Vol. 79. No. 6. P.28–41.
  11. Stiny, G. (2006) Shape: Talking about Seeing and Doing. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  12. STUDIOPLEX (2012) volume 1: Architecture, a timely matter / UCLA Architecture and Urban Design. Tokyo: Sogo Shikaku.
  13. Vermeulen T., Akker van den R. (2010) Notes on metamodernism [Online] Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. N. 2. Available from: http://www.aestheticsandculture.net/index.php/jac/article/view/5677 Partly in Russian Translation: http://dvoetochie.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/metamodernism/

Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-50147 of 06.06.2012 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017