№58
June 2017
ISSN
1990-4126

Russian

«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 46 June 2014

Theory of architecture


Fasonov Andrey L.

PhD student, Department of Theory of Architecture and Professional Communications
Research supervisor: PhD. (Architecture), Associate Professor Alexander G. Burtsev.
Ural State Academy of Architecture and Arts ",
Ekaterinburg, Russia, e-mail: andrey-on-slope@mail.ru

COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AS A RUNAWAY OBJECT


The article illustrates the contemporary tendency in computational architecture and reflects topical ideas in the context of the third-generation activity theory. In this study, the basic qualities of runaway objects and contemporary modes of production (according to Yu. Engestrom) are considered with reference to computational architecture. The hypothesis is that computational architecture could be comprehended from the perspective of how runaway objects function. The goal of the study is to describe architectural processes and their outcomes in accordance with Y. Engestrom’s ideas using as examples the educational projects Branchpoint (Russia) and Emergent Technologies and Design MSc / MArch Programme (UK) as well as the evolution of computational architecture concepts since the second half of the 20th century.

Key words: computational architecture, runaway objects, parametricism, activity theory



References

  1. Branchpoint: parametric architecture, lectures, workshops, studies. About the Branchpoint Project [Online]. Available from: http://branchpoint.ru/about/ (in Russian)
  2. Haiman, E. A New Morphology of Architecture. Why do buildings need genes? [Online]. Available from : http://archi.ru/russia/40448/novaya-morfologiya-arhitektury-zachem-geny-... (in Russian)
  3. Bentley: Architecture, Engineering, Construction Design Software. (2014) AA Component Membrane Canopy for the Architectural Association in London. [Online]. Available from: http://ftp2.bentley.com/dist/collateral/docs/generative_components/CS_AA...
  4. Engeström, Y. (2007) From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. Communities of practice: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.
  5. Engeström, Y. (2006) From Well-Bounded Ethnographies to Intervening in Mycorrhizae Activities. Organization studies, pp. 1783-1793.
  6. Engeström, Y. (2009) The future of activity theory: a rough draft. In: Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 303–328.
  7. Zaha Hadid Architects. (2009–2014) Kartal Pendik Masterplan [Online]. Available from: http://www.zaha-hadid.com/masterplans/kartal-pendik-masterplan/
  8. Kurokawa, K. (1997) Each One a Hero: The Philosophy of Symbiosis. New York: Kodansha International.
  9. Zaha Hadid Architects. (2009-2014) One North Masterplan [Online]. Available from: http://www.zaha-hadid.com/masterplans/one-north-masterplan/
  10. U:Lab.spb KL (2011–2014) Open\Closed city, Branchpoint @ Strelka 2013 [Online]. Available from: http://katyalarina.typepad.com/blog/2013/12/this-summerwithin-a-branchpo... or http://issuu.com/katyalarina_ulab_spb/docs/open_closed_city_workshp_stre... (in Russian)
  11. Schumacher, P. Parametricism as Style: Parametricist Manifesto [Online]. Available from: http://www.patrikschumacher.com/Texts/Parametricism%20as%20Style.htm
  12. Schumacher, P. Parametricism — A New Global Style for Architecture and Urban Design [Online]. Available from : http://www.patrikschumacher.com/Texts/Parametricism%20-%20A%20New%20Glob...


Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-50147 of 06.06.2012 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017