№58
June 2017
ISSN
1990-4126

Russian

«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 46 June 2014

Theory of architecture


Vlasov Victor G.

DSc (Art Studies), Professor, Chair of History of West European Art,
Saint-Petersburg State University,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: natlukina@list.ru

THE HISTORICISM OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE VITRUVIAN TRIAD AS A DESIGN METAPHOR


The article presents a concept of commonality between form generation laws in classical architecture and modern design. The author has carried out a comparative analysis of two fundamental laws : the Vitruvian triad (utilitas, firmitas, venustas) as the foundation of classical architecture, and the triad of classical, or industrial, design (function, form, quality). A new understanding of the contents and historical evolution of these rules leads to a conclusion of their convergence and transformation into a more complex interdependence. The specific feature of this process, typical for the 20th-21st century art, is characterized by the key word “metaphor”, i.e. transference of the properties of one object to another and merger of their meanings.

Key words: classical architecture, architectural theory, architectural design, design



References

  1. Rappaport, A. G. (2004) The Eternal, the Historical and the Opportunistic in Architectural Form. Iskusstvoznaniye, No. 1, p. 497. (in Russian)
  2. Prak, N. L. (1968) The Language of Architecture: A Contribution to Architectural Theory. The Hague-Paris.
  3. Bandmann, G. (2004) Iconologie der Architektur. Translated by S. S. Vaneyan. Iskusstvoznaniye, No. 1, p. 438. (in Russian)
  4. Mikhailov, B. B. (1991) Dmitry Savvich Nedovich (1889—1947). Sovetskoye Iskusstvoznanie, No. 27, p. 495 – 496. (in Russian)
  5. Hildebrand, А. (1991) The Problem of Form in Fine Art and Collected Articles. Мoscow: MPI. (in Russian)
  6. Gabrichevsky, А. G. (2002) Morphology of Art. Мoscow: Agraf. (in Russian)
  7. Gabrichevsky, А. G. Essays on the Ontology of Art (1925). (in Russian)
  8. Maistrovskaya, М. Т. (2011) Evgeny Rozenblum and Exhibition Art. Problemy Dizaina. Мoscow: NII RAH, No. 6, p. 88. (in Russian)
  9. Rozenblum, Е. А. (1974) An Artist in Design. Мoscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
  10. Orlova, E. А. (2011) Artistic Design as a World Outlook. Problemy Dizaina. Мoscow: NII RAH, No. 6, p. 125. (in Russian)
  11. Semper, G. (1970) Praktische Ästhetik. Compilation, introductory article and comments by V. R. Aronov. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
  12. Heidegger, М. (1993) Sein und Zeit: Articles and speeches. Мoscow: Respublika. (in Russian)
  13. Kantor, К. М. (1981) An Essay on Socio-Philosophical Explanation of Design’s Potentialities. Voprosy filosofii, No. 11, p. 83–86. (in Russian)
  14. Aronov, V. R. (1995) Design in 20th Century Culture. Doctor of Art Studies dissertation. Мoscow, p. 29. (in Russian)
  15. Sidorenko, V. F. (2007) Aesthetics of Design Creativity. Moscow: VNIITE, p. 11. (in Russian)
  16. Ikonnikov, А. V. (2002) 20th Century Architecture: Utopias and Reality. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, p. 93. (in Russian)
  17. Glazychev, V. G. (1970) About Design. Moscow: Iskusstvo, p. 27. (in Russian)


Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-50147 of 06.06.2012 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017