№3(59)
September 2017
ISSN
1990-4126

Russian

«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 42 June 2013

Theory of architecture


Shipitsyna Olga A.

PhD (Architecture), Professor, Chair of Theory of Architecture and Professional Communication,
Ural State Academy of Architecture and Arts,
Ekaterinburg, Russia, e-mail: oshipits@usaaa.ru

Margushin Alexander L.

PhD. (Architecture)
Lead Artist, Targem Games
Ekaterinburg, Russia, e-mail: alex_inn@mail.ru

DYNAMIC PROCESSES IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF EKATERINBURG IN THE LATE 20th – EARLY 21st CENTURY


The article reflects on research into the architecture of Ekaterinburg of the late 19th – early 21st century with the aim of establishing the degree of preservation (stabilisation, formation, ordering) and degradation (increase in tension, randomness) of the planning and architectural structure of the city in the course of its evolution. The result of the study is a historical picture of developments in the architecture of Ekaterinburg in the late 19th – early 21st century, which has allowed us to identify the chronological boundaries of changes in architectural activity judging by the re-arrangement of the planning and architectural structure of the city depending on changes in social, economic and political conditions, as well as professional orientations.

The resulting historical picture demonstrates a cyclic character of the evolution of Ekaterinburg architecture with four periods/cycles. In each of these periods, the stage of sustainable development is replaced by a stage of instability and, at times, chaos, with subsequent stabilisation of processes. The cyclic character of evolution has been confirmed by a complex study of the historical evolution of the city’s spatial planning structure and of its master plan from the year of foundation (1723) till the early 20th century. Theoretical consideration of the findings has allowed us to identify five specific features in the architectural and planning evolution of Ekaterinburg and to propose an ensemble-based approach, which should allow an architect to consciously work in dialogue with the existing environment.

 Bibliography

1. Kozinets, L.A. (1989) City stone annals: Architecture of Ekaterinburg/Sverdlovsk of the 18th – early 20th century. Sverdlovsk: Middle Urals Publishing House.

2. Tolstoy, V.P. (ed.) (1997) The art models of the Universe: Interaction between arts in the history of world culture. Moscow: NIIARH.

3. Alferov, N.S. et al. (1980) Sverdlovsk: building and architecture. Moscow: Stroyizdat.

4. Starikov, A.A. (ed.) (1998) Ekaterinburg: city’s history in architecture: album. Ekaterinburg: Sokrat.

5. Tolstoy, V.P. (ed.) (1999) The art models of the Universe: 20th century: interaction in search of a new image of the world. Moscow: NIIARH.

6. Ikonnikov, A.V. (2004) Utopian thinking and architecture: social, world outlook and ideological tendencies in the development of the architectural ensemble. Moscow: Architectura.

7. Azizyan, I.A., Dobritsyna, I.A. and Lebedeva, G.S. (2002) Theory of composition as the poetics of architecture. Research Institute of Theory of Architecture and Town-Planning, Russian Academy of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.

8. Bukin, V.P. and Piskunov, V.A. (1982) Sverdlovsk: prospects for development till 2000. Sverdlovsk: Middle Urals Publishing House.

9. Korotkovsky, A.E., Starikov, A.A. and Ovechkina, E.L. (eds.) (1987) Issues in town-planning and architecture of the Urals: Collected interuniversity papers. Moscow: MRAHI.

Key words: architectural dynamic processes, architecture of Yekaterinburg, architectural ensembles, city evolution


Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-70832 of 30.08.2017 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017