June 2017


«Architecton: proceedings of higher education» № 42 June 2013

Theory of architecture

Vlasov Victor G.

DSc (Art Studies), Professor, Chair of History of West European Art,
Saint-Petersburg State University,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: natlukina@list.ru


The theoretical concepts of architecture that emerged in the second half of the 20th century do not present something whole, being mainly self-reflexions of innovators in building practice or attempts to give some philosophical colouring to isolated quests. The article considers some ideas of the postmodernist architectural theorists and practitioners, comparing them with the well-know classical theories of composition and form generation. The author quotes R. Venturi, G. Deleuze, Ch. Jencks, K. Kurokawa, G. Lynn and proposes a critique of their principal ideas and concludes that such theories are basically secondary compilations. In fact, they present a return to the classical foundations of architecture but are eclectic and oversaturated by excessive definitions obtained from related scientific disciplines: linguistics, semiology, philosophical synergetics and structuralism.

Given the variety of design methods and manners and equalization of various sources and prototypes at the turn of the 20th century, the collapse of this style is obvious. Architecture does no longer follow the laws of continuity of forms. The compilation of sources typical of postmodernist aesthetics creates aesthetic neutrality of designs, which are as if taken out of the sphere of traditional evaluation categories of proportionality, scale, balance, integrity, tectonics, harmony, and beauty. This, in turn, generates social indifference.


1. Heidegger, M. (1993) On Time and Being: Articles and talks. Мoscow: Respublika, pp. 253–254.

2. Jencks, Ch. (1985) The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. Moscow: Stroyizdat.

3. Eco, U. (2005) The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Moscow: Symposium, pp. 117–121.

4. Dobritsyna, I. A. (2004) From Post-Modernism to Non-Linear Architecture. Architecture in the Context of Contemporary Philosophy and Science. Moscow: Progrss-Traditsiya.

5. Kurokawa K. (1991) Intercultural Architecture. The Philosophy of Symbiosis. London.

6. Dobritsyna, I. A. (2009) Understanding the Non-Linear Paradigm in Architecture and the Modelling of the New Integrity: the Theory of «Fold» and the Concept of «Form-Motion». In: Essays on the Architecture of Modern and Contemporary History. Saint-Petersburg: Kolo.

7. Deleuze G. (1997) The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Moscow: Logos, pp. 171–172.

8. Ganja, R. (1998) The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque [Online]. In: Russian Journal. Available at: http://old.russ.ru/journal/kniga/98-11-03/ganzha.htm  (accessed 25.02.13).

9. Kudryavtsev, P. Gregg Lynn’s Theory and Practice [Online]. In: Sovremenny Dom, 2005. Available at: http://archi.ru/files/press/kudryavtsev/dom_09_02_2005_04.htm  

10. Sokolkova, E. M. Digital Architecture as a Metaphor of the Human Organism [Online]. Available at: http://www.karaul-club.ru/index.php/digitalnaya-arkhitektura/item/38html  

11. Orlova, E. A. (2011) Artistic Design as a World Outlook. In: Problemy Dizaina-6. Moscow: The Research Institute of Theory and History of Fine Arts of the Russian Academy of Arts, 2011. pp. 123–162.

12. Daniel, S. M. (1986) The Picture of the Classical Epoch: The Issue of Composition in the 17th Century Western European Painting. Leningrad: Iskusstvo.

13. Vlasov, V.G. (2012) Architectural Composition: An Experience of Typological Modelling [Online]. In: Architecton, No.3 (39). Available at: http://archvuz.ru/2012_3/1

Key words: architectural theory, postmodern architecture, architectural composition, architectural styles, architectural shaping

Russian text of this article

ISSN 1990-4126  Registration MCM el. № ФС 77-50147 of 06.06.2012 © USUAA, 2004-2017  © Architecton, 2004-2017